On Mar 25, 2019, at 4:04 PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > If I understand it correctly, DTLS leaves MTU and fragmentation up to the > application protocol. The DNS has horrible packet size problems, so it > needs a lot more help than DTLS provides. QUIC is much better.
Indeed. My point was simply that this avoids ordering problems, just as QUIC does. I suspect that it is worth having DNS-over-DTLS; QUIC is great, but based on what I’ve been seeing, quite a lot, and probably not appropriate for a lot of use cases where DNS-over-DTLS would do just fine.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
