On 26/03/2019 23:49, Dan York wrote: > As Tim Wicinski mentioned in his review of documents today in DNSOP, this is > not a simple problem to solve and there are some fundamental (and passionate) > disagreements about the way forward. > > Tim’s suggestion of an interim (presumably virtual?) to focus specifically on > this issue seems to make sense to me.
Given the discussion on the list, the chairs have decided to schedule a 10-15 minute slot at the end of the Friday DNSOP session. After an overview of the context, Matthijs Mekking will present the current status of the ANAME draft -02 and (alternative) paths to make progress at the WG. See updated agenda on https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/agenda-104-dnsop-06 Cheers, -- Benno _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
