Hi John, On 9 Jul 2019, at 10:36, John Bambenek <j...@bambenekconsulting.com> wrote:
> If the proposal is to create a standard by which to put contact > information into DNS records, what venue would you suggest? I think that the protocol aspects of this are the least difficult ones. If this is fundamentally the data governance issue that I think it is, I think it would make a lot more sense to align exactly with what is happening in RDAP, treating self-publication as a new profile and DNS as a possible transport. If there's data to publish, thinking about transport afterwards seems far more sensible than inventing a transport and hoping that the data will follow. RDAP profiles are not being discussed in the IETF. I think this is a feature. >> I also agree that without any widespread incentive to implement, test and >> maintain, the data is going to be noisy and sparse to the point where it's >> useless for any practical use anyway. > > You could say the same for SPF. There's an operational incentive to publish SPF records: the need for recipients to accept legitimate mail that is being sent. I don't know what the operational incentive is to publish "whois" data in zone files. Joe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
