Below On 7/9/19 10:07 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > Hi John, > > On 9 Jul 2019, at 10:36, John Bambenek <j...@bambenekconsulting.com> wrote: > >> If the proposal is to create a standard by which to put contact >> information into DNS records, what venue would you suggest? > I think that the protocol aspects of this are the least difficult ones. If > this is fundamentally the data governance issue that I think it is, I think > it would make a lot more sense to align exactly with what is happening in > RDAP, treating self-publication as a new profile and DNS as a possible > transport. If there's data to publish, thinking about transport afterwards > seems far more sensible than inventing a transport and hoping that the data > will follow. No more data governance than there is already in publishing records in DNS today. > > RDAP profiles are not being discussed in the IETF. I think this is a feature. > >>> I also agree that without any widespread incentive to implement, test and >>> maintain, the data is going to be noisy and sparse to the point where it's >>> useless for any practical use anyway. >> You could say the same for SPF. > There's an operational incentive to publish SPF records: the need for > recipients to accept legitimate mail that is being sent. I don't know what > the operational incentive is to publish "whois" data in zone files. Once a critical mass of adoption happens, then a similar incentive... the need for recipients to accept legitimate mail, for one. > > > Joe
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
