On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > From my point of view that was the least important part of it, > an optional extra that might help out CDNs some time in the future, > and not necessary for deployment. Existing ANAME implementations > work fine without it. > > The ANAME draft is far too complicated. I tried to simplify it but in > retrospect I didn't go far enough. >
That's actually why I was very interested in the draft last year. I had to make exporting and importing Zone files with ANAMEs possible. Since an ANAME would have caused a syntax error with any parser not written by me, I ended up adding a semicolon at the beginning of every such line. That worked just fine enough because it's very unlikely that someone would accidentally write a comment looking exactly like an ANAME RR. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
