On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
I've been thinking about whether/how a provider of filtering service (directly or indirectly) could be explicitly trusted to provide filtered "answers".
There is only one method where you can trust the filtering service. That is that they offer you the filtered data in a neutralized fashion. I have already been waiting a few years for the RPZ draft to pass the ISE publication process so the IETF can work on the bis document that moves the censored data into the authoritative section. That way, you get all the data innoculated. Clients not supporting this will not see this data and get filtered. Clients supporting this can talk to an enduser if one is available to say their data was filtered and present a choice on accepting the filter or not. I have poked Paul Vixie and the ISE a number of times on the RPZ draft. I even gave them another full review, but it seems nothing is happening to move this draft forward. If I hadn't been too busy, I would have already submitted a rpz bis draft. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
