On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 2:41 PM Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 17:04 +0200, Benno Overeinder wrote: > > Dear WG, > > > > We have updated the agenda for DNSOP WG session II on Thursday 29 July. > > The updated agenda is uploaded to datatracker: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-06 > > On this version, I see under New Working Group Business a draft (the > black lies sentinel) that was posted two days ago. Can somebody please > explain to me what the purpose of the draft cutoff is, if drafts can > appear in the datatracker, and on an agenda, after the cutoff? > > In the latest version ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-07) > , I see the new business has now been moved -in front- of both current > business, and the discussion on prioritisation of WG activities. > > This is not a comment on the specific draft at all. This is a comment > on WG process. It seems weird to me to discuss prioritisation -after- > we spend time talking about current and, especially, new business. > > I'm sure the chairs will answer you on process, but I wanted to state that I had actually posted -00 before the draft cutoff (-01 posted later was a minor tweak) and asked for agenda time then. The chairs apologized to me later that they hadn't responded earlier and said they could fit me on Thursday. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
