As a follow up to Shumon's email, the order is indeed different than
usual. Normally we schedule current business first, but for
agenda-technical reasons (allowing discussion) we have changed the order.
Hope you understand the exception to the rule.
Best,
-- Benno
On 29/07/2021 21:04, Shumon Huque wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 2:49 PM Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com
<mailto:shu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 2:41 PM Peter van Dijk
<peter.van.d...@powerdns.com <mailto:peter.van.d...@powerdns.com>>
wrote:
This is not a comment on the specific draft at all. This is a
comment
on WG process. It seems weird to me to discuss prioritisation
-after-
we spend time talking about current and, especially, new business.
I'm sure the chairs will answer you on process, but I wanted to
state that I
had actually posted -00 before the draft cutoff (-01 posted later
was a minor
tweak) and asked for agenda time then. The chairs apologized to me
later
that they hadn't responded earlier and said they could fit me on
Thursday.
Quick followup - I'm happy to go at the end. I'm not even sure I was
going to
ask for adoption - this was more information sharing, and asking the WG what
I should do with this draft. So it need not impact the current work
prioritization
discussion. (I am assuming the WG will not bless the BL method, so it is
unlikely
to adopt it or a derivative, but I may be surprised).
Shumon.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
