On Mar 25, 2022, at 5:59 PM, Joey Deng <qiaoyu_deng=40apple....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > A possible format issue:
Thanks! That will be fixed in the next version. > Since the description above mainly focuses on the new cryptography adopted by > DNSSEC, I think it would make more sense to use title like: > > Additional Cryptographic Algorithms in DNSSEC Yes, great. > During my reading of DNS and DNSSEC, I found another RFC (RFC 7129) very > helpful in understanding the motivation from NSEC to NSEC3, besides RFC 5155, > but it is not listed in the draft above (maybe because it is for > informational purposes?). > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7129/ While RFC 7129 is interesting for understanding the protocol, it is background material and maybe not really part of the protocol itself or an extension to the protocol itself. I'm not sure where it would fit into this document. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
