> On Mar 24, 2022, at 4:07 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > All > > If you attended the most recent DNSOP session, you've heard Warren speak > about creating a BCP for DNSSEC, including all of the DNSSEC related RFCs, > in order to make life easier for implementers and DNS operators. > > We want to ask the working group if this is something DNSOP wants to work on. > If so, we can work with Warren to prioritize getting through the approval > process as efficiently as possible. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for: draft-hoffman-dnssec > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-dnssec/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP, and send any comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I think it is suitable for adoption. > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > A couple of things from my first read: Should the abstract perhaps more directly state the goal of documenting DNSSEC as a best current practice? I find the stated purpose “to introduce all of the RFCs in one place” somewhat unconvincing. From section 4: "IANA already has two registries that relate to DNSSEC”. Shouldn’t the DS digest algorithm registry be considered a third? DW _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
