On Apr 26, 2022, at 7:03 AM, Martin Hoffmann <mar...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > Hi! > > Paul Hoffman wrote: >> Greetings. I posted the -01 about ten days ago, and have not heard >> anything since then. The chairs indicated that they wanted this >> fast-tracked, so I'll nudge here for more input, either on the WG >> mailing list on in the repo >> (https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-hoffman-dnssec). If nothing >> big comes up, I'll ask for WG Last Call. > > The draft’s nature of listing all the relevant RFCs reminded me that > back in 2009 the SIP working group published a similar document and > called it ‘The Hitchhikers Guide to SIP.’ > > Maybe it would be a good idea to name this draft in a similar fashion? > Not because the joke is particularly ... fresh but because if it would > become a moniker across the entire IETF, it would be much easier to > identify an RFC that provides an overview of all the relevant documents > for a topic and thus a good starting point for research.
As a previous editor of the "Tao of the IETF", I assure you that cute names have a shelf life much shorter than we expect. Also, SIP was a *much* longer list of RFCs than DNSSEC is, and RFC 5411 was Informational. No one else in the IETF has adopted that naming convention, which I think is appropriate given how excellent the four books in the HHGTTG trilogy are. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
