On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Ted Lemon wrote:
I think your instinct is correct, Tim. It’s not an optimization to bypass discussion as part of a call for adoption. By asking us to consider six drafts at once, and discuss none of them, you create a strong likelihood of insufficient review.
I also missed the option "I don't know yet", which at least I could signal by not filling in the question for 4 of the 6 drafts. Paul
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:45 Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: All We have six documents that have requested adoption from the working group. My opinion is that we send out adoption calls for all of these and let the working group sort it out, but was told that is just crazy. Since Warren loves these poll things, we put another one together on all the documents in question. https://forms.gle/TVKeokYvnU55eq2x7 We'll run this poll for two weeks and end on the 9th of July. However, we have a chai9rs call on the 5th of July and I'm confident we'll have an obvious clear set of documents to begin adoption calls on. thanks tim _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
