Honestly, since doing any sort of poll is "new", maybe the first poll should have been, is doing this via a poll acceptable as a process/policy thing for the WG?
Doing such a poll should include not only how folks feel about using polls for this, but also could ask people to indicate the likelihood that they would participate in future polls, as well as their opinions on how long polls should run? I have not answered the poll in question, FYI, and definitely prefer discussing individual WG items, even if there happen to be a large number of them. I see this as a "vote with your feet" issue. Send many items to the list, and the important ones will get responses (from the perspective of each participant of what is important). The result would basically have a figure-skating-judging element. What matters is not the absolute numbers, what matters is the ordinality (sort order) of participants, upon aggregation. My $0.02. Brian On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:58 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > On Jul 7, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Benno Overeinder <be...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > Gentle reminder, the poll runs until July 9. > > Can you say how the poll will be used? There was pretty strong push-back > after the original announcement, and it's thus unclear how the poll results > will be acted on. > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
