> On Aug 17, 2022, at 12:11 PM, Timothy Mcsweeney <t...@dropnumber.com> wrote: > > >> On 08/17/2022 2:14 PM EDT Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: >> >>> The Intro says" the rightmost label, to signify that the name is NOT rooted >>> in the DNS, and that it should NOT be resolved using the DNS protocol. >>> Isn't that a new root called Alt? >> >> It might or might not be, depending on what the non-DNS protocol chooses. >> This document doesn't tell those protocols what they should do with names >> that end in .alt. > > Clear as mud.
Are you asking that this document tell the non-DNS protocols how to handle names that end in .alt? If so, please suggest text. Personally, I think it is better to let all protocols that we don't control to make their own rules. > More importantly this proposal now sounds like an non-DNS un-restricted > naming scope which puts it out the DNSOP charter right? The last bullet in <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/about/> feels like this draft is part of the DNSOP charter. That's why the WG adopted the draft and it made it to WG Last Call. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
