Mark Andrews wrote:
The only part of RFC 1035 that actually mentions a value is 4.1.2 and no
it doesn't prohibit other values.
No, of course. See my second mail of the thread.
Masataka Ohta
Your second message describes a standard query.
And the question by Ted, which was quoted by you in your first
mail, is:
: I'm not seeing the place in RFC 1034 where it explicitly specifics any
: value at all for QDCOUNT.
which is already answered by my second mail.
It does not prohibit extended query forms be they a different QDCOUNT for
QUERY, a new
opcode which supports multiple queries.
Nor does it prohibit protocol extentions to allow standard queries
have QDCOUNT>1, both of which are totally abstract nonsense for
this subthread.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
