Joe Abley wrote:
1035 clearly allows QDCOUNT>1 for responses
to IQUERY and 1034 clearly specifies QDCOUNT=1 for standard
queries and responses.
It sounds like you agree with the archaeology and the
proposed clarification in the draft.
Even though my statement above is made against:
> RFC 1035's ambiguity on the matter needs clarification.
???
That is not a sincere response.
There is no ambiguity.
That you see no need for any clarification while others say
differently is
Because others ignore 1034.
IMHO, those mentioning ambiguity of 1035 without reading
1034 can have no opinion on the matter.
If people feel some ambiguity of 1035 merely because they
ignore 1034, there is no point to publish yet another RFC
for disambiguation, because the new RFC, either, won't
be read.
Read the RFCs.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
