It appears that Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> said: >> Oh, I completely agree. My point was just that even in the root which is >> small and you >> would hope would change slowly, it's still a challenge to track what's lame. > >It’s not a challenge to track what is lame. It’s dead simple. You just have >to look. Getting >it addressed is the challenge.
Yeah, that's a better way to put it. But the main point still stands, that it would be a signficant operational change to insist that all delegated NS be active when delegated, and even moreso to insist that they continue to be active. Back in the 1990s when you registered names by email, NetSol checked that your NS were active before accepting them, but that was back when it was normal for the back and forth for registering a name to take a week. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
