All Thanks for all the comments on this draft. While we saw many comments addressing the contents, and Daniel was very quick to address, the chairs did not hear consensus in support of moving the draft forward.
We talked about this with our AD, and he agrees with our assessment. We are going to mark draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements as "Parked" for the time being. Please note this does not mean the work is of no value. Anyone interested is welcome to continue working on the subject, and we’re happy to un-park the draft at some later date if there’s active support for it. Thanks tim On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 6:58 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > The chairs want to thank everyone for the feedback on this document > recently. We've been in discussions with Warren and the authors about this > document, and we have some questions we'd like the working group to help us > resolve. > > While this work was relevant when it was first written and adopted, we > feel that over time the DNSSEC landscape has changed and this document may > not be as relevant as it once was. > > Questions to consider: > > Should this draft be removed from the WG? > Are there fundamental issues that need to be addressed in this document? > Are there items in the document that should be moved to another document? > > The chairs are currently considering abandoning this document in its > current state. We'd like to hear from others on this. > > We're going to let comments run for two weeks, and wrap up June 12, 2023. > > Thanks > tim > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
