> Le 9 oct. 2023 à 10:02, Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40meta....@dmarc.ietf.org> a 
> écrit :
> 
> This is fun to think about,

Fun? Not sure I get what you are saying. 

> but it seems to me that these networks should avoid any reliance on the ICANN 
> DNS tree. 

This has been discussed. There are pros and cons on using the current root. But 
if we don’t, then you are essentially creating an alternate root and you need 
to recreate the whole trust chain, and myriad of consequences, both technical 
and governance. 

> I doubt that any network of space probes on Io can accept the risk of a 
> technical or governance issue on .io.

This draft does not require the use of a specific TLD.  There are many 
hierarchies one can use. We wanted to avoid that discussion and punt it to some 
other venues. Instead, just the methods to make it work, whatever is the 
hierarchy chosen.
> 
> Regardless, I think the draft would more helpful if drawn from real-world(s) 
> systems, rather than speculating about architectures that might apply in some 
> distant hypothetical scenario.  (If some of the proposed architectures are 
> inspired by real systems, I suggest adding citations to that effect.)

The citations are there. It  references a draft which gives the overall 
architecture. That draft includes citations to what the space agencies are 
doing now. It starts with Moon then Mars. Both are referenced in the deepspace 
draft. (Look for IOAG documents)

So what about the actual content? 

Marc.

> 
> --Ben Schwartz
> From: DNSOP <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org>> on 
> behalf of Marc Blanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 
> <mailto:marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca>>
> Sent: Sunday, October 8, 2023 3:17 PM
> To: dnsop@ietf.org <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org> <dnsop@ietf.org 
> <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>>
> Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for 
> draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks-00.txt
>  
> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
> You have not previously corresponded with this sender. 
> Hello,
>  The primary use case of this draft is the deployment of naming 
> infrastructure on celestial bodies networks, but could be applied for other 
> use cases. 
> 
> Would love to get people reviews and comments.
> 
> Marc.
> 
>> Début du message transféré :
>> 
>> De: internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>> Objet: New Version Notification for 
>> draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks-00.txt
>> Date: 8 octobre 2023 à 15:16:10 HAE
>> À: "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 
>> <mailto:marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca>>
>> 
>> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Marc Blanchet and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:     draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks
>> Revision: 00
>> Title:    Domain Name System in Mostly Isolated Networks
>> Date:     2023-10-08
>> Group:    Individual Submission
>> Pages:    7
>> URL:      
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks-00.txt
>> Status:   
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks/
>> HTML:     
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks-00.html
>> HTMLized: 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-many-dnsop-dns-isolated-networks
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> 
>>   This document lists operational methods to enable local DNS name
>>   resolving on an isolated network, where that network have
>>   intermittent reachability to Internet and/or have very long delays,
>>   disabling the real-time query and response flow to the authoritative
>>   name servers on Internet.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to