Hi Dave, As I sent an email last week, http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02960.html
I think that I solved (i) and (iv) comments in the new version: http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/~paul/publications/ietf-internet-draft/draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-02.txt Therefore, I'll reflect (ii) and (iii) comments on our 02 version and submit it to IETF. Could David and others check this? Thanks. Jaehoon Paul Jeong --- David Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:19:28PM -0400, Ralph > Droms wrote: > >> Jinmei-san contributed some comments > >> > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02915.html) > that I think the > >> authors should address as well. > > Yes, thanks Ralph; sorry for overlooking that one; > it > should definitely be addressed. Authors, just to > review > the current list: > > (i). Eliminate normative references as proposed > by Thomas > > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02959.html) > > (ii). Address the comments from Ohta-san > > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02966.html) > > (iii). Address the comments from Pekka > > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02967.html) > > (iv). Address the comments from Jinmei-san > > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02915.html) > > Thanks, > > Dave > > >> > >> - Ralph > >> > >> At 09:09 AM 7/7/2004 -0700, David Meyer wrote: > >> >On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:41:13AM -0400, Ralph > Droms wrote: > >> >>> I agree with Thomas and Rob that "IPv6 Host > Configuration of DNS Server > >> >>> Information Approaches" should be published > as an RFC so that the > >> >content of > >> >>> the document is retained permanently. I like > Thomas' suggestion to > >> >>> eliminate the dependency on publication of > the specific drafts as RFCs > >> >by > >> >>> including a summary description of the basic > approach in those drafts > >> >and > >> >>> recommend we make that change to "IPv6 Host > Configuration of DNS Server > >> >>> Information Approaches". > >> > > >> > For the most part, we can declare WG > consensus on the > >> > publication issue (i.e., clearly we want > to capture this > >> > work this time out). > >> > > >> > Regarding logistics: > >> > > >> > The extended WCLC for this document ends > today. What I > >> > would like the authors to do is as > follows: > >> > > >> > (i). Eliminate normative references > as proposed by > >> > Thomas > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02959.html) > >> > > >> > (ii). Address the comments from > Ohta-san > >> > > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02966.html) > >> > > >> > (iii). Address the comments from Pekka > >> > > (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02967.html) > >> > > >> > > >> > Once this is done, post a the -02 draft > to the I-D > >> > repository and we'll send it on to our > ADs. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Dave > . > dnsop > resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: > http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html > mhonarc archive: > http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
