It's difficult to distinguish example code and others on Transifex.
We're targeting 100% translation on Transifex, but it's impossible if
example codes are included and Japanese team doesn't translate it.
How about including example codes in PO files only when a language team
asks to? So by default, PO files won't change for locales who prefer to
use original code, thus your percentage wouldn't be affected.
Instead of just my personal preference, benefits of using identifiers in
native languages seem to have been proven long time ago, as stated in the
rationale part of PEP 3131.
I think "enabling" to do it and "encouraging" to do it have different bar.
So I don't agree PEP 3131 is enough reason to do it.
I'd rather not start a debate about whether the benefits are big enough
to 'encourage' the practice rather than just 'enabling' it, because it
depends on too many factors like language differences and personal
experiences. Similar to PEP 3131, here I'm just asking to support such
practice when translating official documentation, but certainly not
enforcing it. IMO this feature would be potentially beneficial for other
languages too.
Pitifully I've not seen any active member from
Chinese translation team here yet.
There is no official team yet, but there is zh_CN team on the Transifex.
See https://www.transifex.com/python-doc/teams/5390/zh_CN/
I think there is an active community because there are
many Python developers in China.
Please build active language team there. Without official language team,
we won't add Chinese translation to docs.python.org.
I wonder what's difference between the official team and zh_CN team on
Transifex? I'd like to see if I could help building the official one.
Thanks,
Xuan.
_______________________________________________
Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
