> > But most of what you said works both ways. What maybe in my eyes > totally wrong might turn out to be totally right, and what maybe in > your eyes totally right might turn out to be totally wrong! But I guess > thats why two or three heads are better than one.
Exactly! and that's why "two or three heads are better than one"... (my head included) > You've been working > on GNOME all by yourself the past year because no one was there to help > you. Now you do! > > So I ask you, in the paper your going to write on how to do QA on > GNOME, to please not put in a lot of strict rules that the contributors > will have to follow when translating (thats the QAC's job). I suggest > instead that you put forth a team framework, a set of guidelines on how > we can put our ideas forward and discuss them with each other, and > leave room for individual decision-making and freedom. If we get > together and have a meeting over every little change we have to make, > efficiency will be terrible and we wont finish a thing by the deadline. > You're afraid of getting your freedom cut ;) As I was in the same situation long ago, I think I'll make you more then happy with that paper... Salam > Thanks again for all your efforts, > > Abdulaziz, > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Doc mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc > _______________________________________________ Doc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
