Jirka Kosek wrote:
Bob Stayton wrote:
tables, admonitions, lists, etc. (but not para). I'm sure there were
good arguments at the time for such a design, but I have never liked
it. The simpara element (simple para) was created for those who don't
want such a structure. The simpara element does not allow other block
elements, only inline elements.
For my customers, I usually redefine para to have the same content model
as simpara to remove complexity of nested block elements:
Far more sensible Jirka.
I wonder what the original reason was, unless it was M$ type of pressure
to have everything everywhere.
I'm tempted to put an RFE in at sourceforge.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
