Hello, Fair enough --- but understand that would would edit it ;)
J On 31 Oct 2001, Norman Walsh wrote: >/ Poet/Joshua Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: >| OpenDocs publishing is considering publishing the 2.02 version of DocBook >| the Definitive Guide. > >Please don't. The 2.0.2 version is entirely unready for print >publication: it's a work in progress, slowly making a transformation >from an SGML-centric book about DocBook 3.1 to a more XML-centric book >about DocBook 4.x. > >Wait for 2.1.x, please. That's what that middle number is for :-) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- -- <COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY> <PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT> <PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT> <WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER> -- Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
