On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:07:10AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > So my proposal is that we allow most (all?) inline elements to > optionally function as simple links. We may also want to allow > selected other elements (like funcprototype) to function as simple > links as well.
Which inline elements do you mean here (i.e., which PE definitions)? Or, do you mean anything that can be found inside of <para>? There's a reasonably good case for making block elements such as section and chapter take xlinks as well; it makes it easier to compose larger works from smaller works without resorting to defining entities in the local subset, especially when using xlink:show="embed". (Perhaps this means that there are a class of elements where xlink:show is only meaningful if it is xlink:show="embed"...) > For extended links, I'm not sure what makes the most sense. For those of us who aren't keeping track of XLink progress, can you please provide a 30-second refresher of what an extended link is? :-) Thanks muchly, Z. ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>