On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote: > Norman Walsh wrote: > > > Given a PE like this: > > > > <!ENTITY % xlink-optional-simple-link " > > xlink:type (simple) #IMPLIED > > I think that there should be #FIXED "simple", so one is not forced to > add xlink:type="simple" to every start tag with link. This will save > typing, but make all instances of particular element simple link. I'm > not sure if this is problem, XLink spec. is quite vague in this topic:
It's an error in my mind because I definitely want to make use of extended linkx and this would make this impossible. > If there is a way to rename xlink:href in XLink I would say, adopt it No, this was beaten to death for 2 years, forget about this. > Is there anybody who need to use extended links? If there is no stress Yes, me. I want to be able to use external link bases containing generic indexes for a collections of documents at least. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>