dotregister wrote:
> Thanks for all the quick replies to this. I know that the root of the TUCOWS 
> policy is meant in good faith (fair marketplace and all) and it may protect 
> the end user to have this ability to move domains when in arrears, but it 
> does not certainly help the reseller. We have lost a few bucks this way to 
> customers who found out quite easily that the alternative to paying was 
> running. I was also told I the past by TUCOWS that we should utilize 
> “collection agencies” to recover the funds owed. Well…I don’t know about you 
> but “collections” is bloody expensive, and not something we want to do.
> 
> You can see how this is inherently flawed. The TUCOWS policy is meant to 
> protect the end-user but it does not protect the very root of your business, 
> the reseller. When you are owed money for services and then client finds out 
> that there is a "back door" they can bolt through and not have to pay, many 
> will likely take the opportunity.  How many customers do you think have 
> actually paid what they owed to the resellers after transferring their domain 
> and services away? I would hazard to guess, none.
> 
> When a domain registrant phones up TUCOWS to find out what their options are, 
> and the registrant says they have tried to deal with the reseller and got 
> nowhere (because they don’t want to pay what they owe), does TUCOWS then say 
> “OK, we will unlock your domain and you can do whatever you want. Sorry about 
> the trouble.”
> 
> Don’t you think TUCOWS should contact the reseller in this case and say, 
> “Hey, what’s’ up with 1234.com?” “Oh…they owe you money?” “OK, we will inform 
> them of the issue at hand”. Then TUCOWS should contact the registrant and 
> tell them they should straighten out their billing issues with the reseller, 
> to gain control of the domain again.
> 
> Thanks again for your comments.
> 
> GB
> 
> DotRegister.ca
> ---------------


First off, it is not Tucows policy that we're discussing - it is ICANN 
policy. Tucows policy can change and is mostly rational.

Second, if the name was locked, then I'm not sure why it would have been 
unlocked by Tucows. I can dig into this if you contact me offlist with 
details. The lock is the only way that a transfer can be prevented in 
instances like this. Tucows cannot stand in the way of a transfer as you 
propose while the gory billing details get sorted out - unless we 
violate our agreement with ICANN.

-r
_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to