Grrrr, I messed up my example. I should have said:

"but the transfer request (from the gaining registrar) goes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (LAGGED, old, invalid), instead of properly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (REAL-TIME)?

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/

--- George Kirikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> --- Adam Eisner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is definitely not a cost-cutting move, no. Keep in mind real- 
> > time results are still available via RWI and API. If it impacts how
>  
> > you (or anyone else on the list for that matter) operate your  
> > business, though, would be very interested in hearing about it;  
> > please drop me a line off-list.
> 
> Wouldn't there be potential problems by not having it real-time, e.g.
> for outgoing transfers? 
> 
> Scenario: example.com WHOIS is updated to reflect a new admin email
> address in advance of an outgoing transfer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of
> the old [EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner then immediately attempts to transfer
> the
> domain name to GoDaddy or NSI or someone else (for whatever
> legitimate
> reason), but the transfer request (from the gaining registrar) goes
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and this could cause a lag of
> up
> to a week at some registrar systems, if they don't allow one to
> cancel
> the transfer request but instead have to wait for it to fail)
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/
> 

_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to