On 10/12/09 12:33, John Carlyle-Clarke wrote: > On 10/12/09 11:38, Tim Allen wrote: >> Re 28 day/30 day window: >> >> http://www.dyndns.com/services/dns/dyndns/readme.html#abuse >> > From reading that, my interpretation is that an "abusive" update is an > update containing the same IP address. "Dozens" of these are allowed > before an account is blocked, to allow for things like setting up new > clients, etc. An update of the same IP address is allowed every 28 days > in order to avoid the 30 day inactivity timeout. However, if your > address changes more frequently than every 30 days you will not have any > problems. > > Yes, obviously being unable to update with a new IP address would make the service useless. Also, I agree that there has to be, and is, leeway on this - for a start I doubt the clients remember the last update across a machine reboot.
Tim -- Next meeting: Dorchester, Tuesday 2010-01-05 20:00 Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset
