On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I hope the performance is better since 1.0's performance (on our system) > is really bad (so bad that some of my users have been complaining since > it feels more sluggish than the older UW-Imap-based system (which > granted had it mail spool on local disks). Another thing I'm thinking > about is going back to have the mail spool on local disks but I'd rather > avoid that if I can.
then something is not right in your setup, becasue dovecots performance is much better than courier-iamp or UW... How many times do I have to ask for dovecot -n output?? That might point to where your config is fubared and causing your performance problems - but it is most likely a configuration issue related to NFS... Just try 1.1 - I think you'll just end up asking yourself why you waited so long... ;) -- Best regards, Charles
