Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, June 11 at 05:01 PM, quoth Hugo Monteiro:
Have you tried the plugin using the mailtrain backend?
The antispam plugin? No, I haven't... mostly because it looks like no
matter which backend I use, I'd have to alter the user-visible
interface to my training system (which I don't really want to do), and
it still doesn't handle the "altered message" problem.
Basically it will forward the message, as attachment, to spam/notspam
addresses that you define. That includes the use of a %u variable
expansion, if you choose to use retrain addresses like like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or something. I've been pretty happy with
with it and it scales a lot better than piping the message into a
retrain command, since the mail system itself will handle the load in
a more intelligent way.
Hmmm, load is something I hadn't thought about... (the system I'm
working with at the moment has plenty of capacity to spare). That's a
good point.
However, one of the goals here is to make it so that if a user
identifies a message that has been mistakenly tagged as spam (and
"sanitized" by SpamAssassin, e.g. via the "report_safe" setting), they
can get the message corrected (and back to its original form)
immediately. As it is, they have to put it into the NotSpam folder and
wait a couple minutes for the message to reappear in the INBOX
(because the cron job only runs every so often).
~Kyle
No need to reply to the other message regarding the "why". ;)
Has for what you're saying .. maybe it could be possible to extend the
plugin to remove/add headers.. Though i have no idea on the impact that
would have on IMAP clients...
Regards,
Hugo Monteiro.
--
ci.fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature
Hugo Monteiro
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
Centro de Informática
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Quinta da Torre 2829-516 Caparica Portugal
Telefone: +351 212948596 Fax: +351 212948548
www.ci.fct.unl.pt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ci.fct.unl.pt:~# _
