On 7/17/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote: > Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions > without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during the > move/conversion.
This just sounds great, and yes, I can definitely see a need for both. > I think even using dsync for backups should be considered as two-way > replication. If there really are some new mails in your backup server > that aren't in the primary server, it most likely means you just lost > some mails on your primary server and you need to get them back. Or you just deleted them and *don't* want them back... ;) -- Best regards, Charles