On 7/17/2009 3:59 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 15:57 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> I think even using dsync for backups should be considered as two-way >>> replication. If there really are some new mails in your backup server >>> that aren't in the primary server, it most likely means you just lost >>> some mails on your primary server and you need to get them back. >> Or you just deleted them and *don't* want them back... ;) > > Ah, but dsync catches those too! > > If a message exists in one side but doesn't exist on the other side, > dsync asks for a list of recently expunged messages. If it finds the > message from there with same IMAP UID and same GUID, it's expunged from > the other side too. > > Basically the same will work with mailbox deletions and unsubscribes > too. It'll just need to store a list of mailbox GUIDs there were > deleted/unsubscribed.
Somehow I knew you would have already thought of that... So, when will 2.0 be in any kind of semi-usable state (by non-programmer types)? ;) -- Best regards, Charles