On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:16 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:06 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So is this targeted as a kind of replication solution then?
Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions
without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during
the
move/conversion.
Cool. I just built a master/slave redundant dovecot last night with
DRBD and heartbeat and this sounds easier. ;)
Well, by "continuous" I didn't actually really mean "continuous" but
"periodic" or something :) Meaning you'd have to run dsync every time
after something changes and separately for each user. So you could do
a bit laggy replication using it, but it's not really the permanent or
the most efficient solution for that.
