Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> writes: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 22:31 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote: >> This sounds really awesome! How testable is it? > > By "testable" do you mean "is it working now"? It should work except for > mailbox deletions and renames. But I haven't really tested it, just ran > unit tests. :) And it pretty much requires using Dovecot v2.0 for IMAP > so that it can handle expunges properly. And I wouldn't really recommend > doing that yet..
Would this setup work then? - dovecot 1.2 on master and slave machines - dsync on the slave machine, 2 way sync - propagate expunges by some other means, like removing maildir mail files with unison or similar? How would I handle mailbox addition, renaming and deletions? > >> My setup would be: >> - one server dovecot that is online all the time, filtering email to several >> mailboxes with sieve scripts >> - the server dovecot would receive changes through a webmail instance >> - a dovecot running on my laptop that I would like to be in sync with >> the server dovecot. I read mail there with Gnus. > > Yeah, should work with that setup. > >> Theres only a one user(me) that would have this setup, but there are >> a handful of other users as well. I have a couple of hundred mailboxes >> to sync. Can all mailboxes be synced automatically, or do I need to make >> a list of them for dsync? > > User's all mailboxes are synced automatically. -- Joakim Verona