(cc'ing the dev-list) A gadget probably makes good sense on vista (afai understand gadgets on vista).
Thanks Charlie. > -----Original Message----- > From: Charlie Russel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:44 AM > To: Glenn Carr > Subject: RE: x64 DQSD > > No problem. I tried to reply to the dev list, but I think it bounced. > (I'm signed in with a different account on it.) > > Kim used this same machine when we did the original x64 > build, but used > the previous compiler version, since VS2k5 wasn't final yet. > > I've also lined up a developer who is looking at making a Vista Gadget > out of DQSD. Which is, IMHO, the future of DQSD - trying to > work around > MS's tightened architecture to add something to the taskbar is just > fighting harder than needs to be. The gadget approach would still use > the same xml files, but just have a different engine in front. > > As for access - if someone wants it, feel free to give them > access. Just > cc me so I know. That way if I'm offline (as I will be during daylight > hours all this week), then I'm not the bottleneck. > > Charlie. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Glenn Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: December-03-06 10:38 PM > > To: Charlie Russel > > Subject: RE: x64 DQSD > > > > Cool. I copied the dev list in case Kim or anyone else had time to > check > > it > > out. If they wanted to contact you for the access info, > I'm sure they > > could > > use the same stuff I started messing with. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Charlie Russel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:23 AM > > > To: Glenn Carr > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: x64 DQSD > > > > > > Glen - I can certainly keep it up and available as necessary > > > - I've got > > > a window of at least a week where it won't be any issue > at all, and > > > probably longer. > > > > > > You might want to check with Kim as well - I know he resolved > several > > > issue with 3.1.9.1 to get it to compile in 64-bit, but that was an > > > earlier version of the compiler. > > > > > > Charlie. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Glenn Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: December-03-06 10:20 PM > > > > To: Charlie Russel > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > Subject: RE: x64 DQSD > > > > > > > > Charlie, > > > > > > > > After one change, I was able to build 32-bit version of > > > both DLLs with > > > > 2005 > > > > (although with several warnings about deprecated > > > functions), but there > > > are > > > > a > > > > few (seemingly minor) errors with the 64-bit compiles that I > haven't > > > > resolved (or spent much time trying). > > > > > > > > I'll keep playing with it, but I probably need to > create a couple > of > > > svn > > > > branches, one for 32-bit vs2005 builds, and one for > 64-bit vs2005 > > > builds > > > > in > > > > order to check in the changes. I'm getting a 403 Forbidden > > > error now > > > > trying > > > > to create a branch though, so I'll look into that. > > > > > > > > I don't have vs2005 at home, so I'll have to continue to > > > work with the > > > > test > > > > box if it will be available. > > > > > > > > Glenn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
