> All this said, of course we *could* plug an explicit browser into the
> existing framework, it's just turning into a bit of a mess...
I'm opposed to that - it just creates a mess. I'd far rather just live
with 64-bit IE. 

> 
> > I'd also like to see a Windows(vista) Gadget implementation of DQSD.
> This shouldn't be all that hard, just a gadget shell that then calls
> into the existing DQSD installation. With Windows 7 now in wide beta,
> those gadgets are no longer tied to the gadget bar, which is gone.
> Instead, they can float to wherever you want them. No more giving up
> tonnes of real estate for a couple of gadgets.
> 
> Yep. I'm hoping someone wants to investigate whether hosting IE inside
> a gadget is a viable idea... :-)
>From what _little_ I understand about gadgets, I'm not at all sure you
need to. Apparently they are themselves little more than web pages, so
using them to call into DQSD should be quite possible. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________
Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel

Reply via email to