On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:19:42 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> virtual is a protected keyword in C++ and can't be used at all. Ugh.
> 
> This aligns the kernel versions of the drm headers with the ones in
> libdrm.
> 
> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> index a0ebfe7c9a28..d299c7749091 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> @@ -373,7 +373,11 @@ struct drm_buf_pub {
>   */
>  struct drm_buf_map {
>       int count;              /**< Length of the buffer list */
> +#ifdef __cplusplus
> +     void *virt;
> +#else
>       void __user *virtual;           /**< Mmap'd area in
> user-virtual */ +#endif
>       struct drm_buf_pub __user *list;        /**< Buffer
> information */ };
>  

Why not simply rename the field ?

-- 
Gabriel Laskar

Reply via email to