On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:55:17PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2016-03-30 13:07 GMT-03:00 Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>: > > On 30 March 2016 at 15:19, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > >> These type defines are officially part of the uapi, but ended up in > >> the wrong headers somehow when we split them all. > >> > >> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> > > The way it was done originally (by Paulo) with commit > > c543188afb7a83e66161c026dc6fd5eb38dc0b63 it seemed deliberate. At the > > same time the libdrm got a different treatment > > 8c75703df0fdf65b3851f8eb5822705638decff3. Would be swell Paulo can > > confirm (re: unintentional or deliberate difference), if he recalls > > any of this :-) > > > > Barring any objections from Paulo > > No objections from Paulo. The include/uapi directory didn't even exist > at that time, and I guess I was just trying to make things work, > without any specific coding philosophy in mind.
Yeah, I suspect that this was actually fumbled in the uapi split-up somehow ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch