On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:55:17PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2016-03-30 13:07 GMT-03:00 Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>:
> > On 30 March 2016 at 15:19, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >> These type defines are officially part of the uapi, but ended up in
> >> the wrong headers somehow when we split them all.
> >>
> >> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > The way it was done originally (by Paulo) with commit
> > c543188afb7a83e66161c026dc6fd5eb38dc0b63 it seemed deliberate. At the
> > same time the libdrm got a different treatment
> > 8c75703df0fdf65b3851f8eb5822705638decff3. Would be swell Paulo can
> > confirm (re: unintentional or deliberate difference), if he recalls
> > any of this :-)
> >
> > Barring any objections from Paulo
> 
> No objections from Paulo. The include/uapi directory didn't even exist
> at that time, and I guess I was just trying to make things work,
> without any specific coding philosophy in mind.

Yeah, I suspect that this was actually fumbled in the uapi split-up
somehow ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to