> 
> When the QXL driver receives a QXL_INTERRUPT_CLIENT_MONITORS_CONFIG
> interrupt,
> we currently always notify userspace that there was some hotplug event.
> 
> However, gnome-shell/mutter is reacting to this event by attempting a
> resolution change, which it does by issueing drmModeRmFB, drmModeAddFB,
> and then drmModeSetCrtc. This has the side-effect of causing
> qxl_crtc_mode_set() to tell the QXL virtual hardware that a primary
> surface was destroyed and created. After going through QEMU and then the
> remote SPICE client, a new identical monitors config message will be
> sent, resulting in a QXL_INTERRUPT_CLIENT_MONITORS_CONFIG interrupt to
> be emitted, and the same scenario occurring again.
> 
> As destroying/creating the primary surface causes a visible screen
> flicker, this makes the guest hard to use (
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266484 ).
> 
> This commit checks if the screen configuration we received is the same
> one as the current one, and does not notify userspace about it if that's
> the case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>

Great message!

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c | 65
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> index 156b7de..edb90f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> @@ -57,11 +57,18 @@ static void qxl_alloc_client_monitors_config(struct
> qxl_device *qdev, unsigned c
>       qdev->client_monitors_config->count = count;
>  }
>  
> +enum MonitorsConfigCopyStatus {
> +     MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED,
> +     MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED,
> +     MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC,
> +};
> +

I don't remember exactly kernel style, a 

typedef enum {
        MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED,
        MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED,
        MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC,
} MonitorsConfigCopyStatus;

could make following code shorter.

>  static int qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(struct qxl_device
>  *qdev)

why not returning MonitorsConfigCopyStatus ?

>  {
>       int i;
>       int num_monitors;
>       uint32_t crc;
> +     bool changed = false;
>  

using a "MonitorsConfigCopyStatus res = MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED" here
could make return statement shorter.

>       num_monitors = qdev->rom->client_monitors_config.count;
>       crc = crc32(0, (const uint8_t *)&qdev->rom->client_monitors_config,
> @@ -70,7 +77,7 @@ static int
> qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(struct qxl_device *qdev)
>               qxl_io_log(qdev, "crc mismatch: have %X (%zd) != %X\n", crc,
>                          sizeof(qdev->rom->client_monitors_config),
>                          qdev->rom->client_monitors_config_crc);
> -             return 1;
> +             return MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC;
>       }
>       if (num_monitors > qdev->monitors_config->max_allowed) {
>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("client monitors list will be truncated: %d < 
> %d\n",
> @@ -79,6 +86,10 @@ static int
> qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(struct qxl_device *qdev)
>       } else {
>               num_monitors = qdev->rom->client_monitors_config.count;
>       }
> +     if (qdev->client_monitors_config
> +           && (num_monitors != qdev->client_monitors_config->count)) {
> +             changed = true;
> +     }
>       qxl_alloc_client_monitors_config(qdev, num_monitors);
>       /* we copy max from the client but it isn't used */
>       qdev->client_monitors_config->max_allowed =
> @@ -88,17 +99,42 @@ static int
> qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(struct qxl_device *qdev)
>                       &qdev->rom->client_monitors_config.heads[i];
>               struct qxl_head *client_head =
>                       &qdev->client_monitors_config->heads[i];
> -             client_head->x = c_rect->left;
> -             client_head->y = c_rect->top;
> -             client_head->width = c_rect->right - c_rect->left;
> -             client_head->height = c_rect->bottom - c_rect->top;
> -             client_head->surface_id = 0;
> -             client_head->id = i;
> -             client_head->flags = 0;
> +             if (client_head->x != c_rect->left) {
> +                     client_head->x = c_rect->left;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }
> +             if (client_head->y != c_rect->top) {
> +                     client_head->y = c_rect->top;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }
> +             if (client_head->width != c_rect->right - c_rect->left) {
> +                     client_head->width = c_rect->right - c_rect->left;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }
> +             if (client_head->height != c_rect->bottom - c_rect->top) {
> +                     client_head->height = c_rect->bottom - c_rect->top;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }
> +             if (client_head->surface_id != 0) {
> +                     client_head->surface_id = 0;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }
> +             if (client_head->id != i) {
> +                     client_head->id = i;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }

quite similar code... I would write a macro but I'm a too macro fun :)
Would be something like this

        if (client_head->id != i)
                res = MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED;
        client_head->id = i;

make sense?

> +             if (client_head->flags != 0) {
> +                     client_head->flags = 0;
> +                     changed = true;
> +             }

why testing flags change if is always 0 ?

>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("read %dx%d+%d+%d\n", client_head->width,
>               client_head->height,
>                         client_head->x, client_head->y);
>       }
> -     return 0;
> +     if (changed) {
> +             return MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED;
> +     } else {
> +             return MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED;
> +     }

Here it would be just "return res;".

>  }
>  
>  static void qxl_update_offset_props(struct qxl_device *qdev)
> @@ -124,9 +160,18 @@ void qxl_display_read_client_monitors_config(struct
> qxl_device *qdev)
>  {
>  
>       struct drm_device *dev = qdev->ddev;
> -     while (qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev)) {
> +     enum MonitorsConfigCopyStatus status;
> +
> +     status = qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev);
> +     while (status == MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC) {
>               qxl_io_log(qdev, "failed crc check for client_monitors_config,"
>                                " retrying\n");
> +             status = qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev);
> +     }

Usually I would write something like

        for (;;) {
                status = qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev);
                if (status != MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC)
                        break;
                qxl_io_log(qdev, "failed crc check for client_monitors_config,"
                                 " retrying\n");
        }

or

        while ((status = qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev))
                ==  MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC) {
                qxl_io_log(qdev, "failed crc check for client_monitors_config,"
                                 " retrying\n");
        }

(just style and probably indentation is even wrong)

> +     if (status == MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED) {
> +             qxl_io_log(qdev, "config unchanged\n");
> +             DRM_DEBUG("ignoring unchanged client monitors config");
> +             return;
>       }
>  
>       drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);

Beside all that style paranoia/opinions:

Acked-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>

(feel free to take into account some or none of them).

Frediano

Reply via email to