On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:38:43AM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote: > Hi Daniel, Alexey, > > > On 25-05-2017 15:19, Jose Abreu wrote: > > Now that we have a callback to check if crtc supports a given mode > > we can use it in arcpgu so that we restrict the number of probbed > > modes to the ones we can actually display. > > > > This is specially useful because arcpgu crtc is responsible to set > > a clock value in the commit() stage but unfortunatelly this clock > > does not support all the needed ranges. > > > > Also, remove the atomic_check() callback as mode_valid() callback > > will be called before. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joab...@synopsys.com> > > Reviewed-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com> > > @Daniel: I know that arcpgu is not under drm-misc but could you > apply this into drm-misc-next? Alexey (the arcpgu maintainer) > already gave the reviewed-by and this is also "Reviewed-by: Neil > Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>". It was also tested-by: me. > > @Alexey: Is this ok for you? > > I need this because I have a pending patch for accepting clock > variations instead of always failing when clk_round_rate() does > not return the expected rate.
Alexey reviewed it already, and Dave acked it for merging through drm-misc, so applied. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
