That's purely for the uapi layer to implement the ALLOW_MODESET flag.

Drivers should instead look at the state, e.g. through
drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(), which vmwgfx already does. Also remove
the confusing comment, since checking allow_modeset is at best a micro
optimization.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
index 049bd50eea87..1b2a406b7742 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
@@ -1681,14 +1681,6 @@ vmw_kms_atomic_check_modeset(struct drm_device *dev,
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-       if (!state->allow_modeset)
-               return ret;
-
-       /*
-        * Legacy path do not set allow_modeset properly like
-        * @drm_atomic_helper_update_plane, This will result in unnecessary call
-        * to vmw_kms_check_topology. So extra set of check.
-        */
        for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
                if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state))
                        need_modeset = true;
-- 
2.19.0.rc2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to