On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:49:30PM +0000, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, Daniel, > > On 10/02/2018 03:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > The idea behind allowing drivers to override legacy ioctls (instead of > > using the generic implementations unconditionally) is to handle bugs > > in old driver-specific userspace. Like e.g. vmw_kms_set_config does, > > to work around some vmwgfx userspace not clearing its ioctl structs > > properly. > > > > But you can't use it to augment semantics and put in additional > > checks, since from a correctly working userspace's pov there should > > not be any difference in behaviour between the legacy and the atomic > > paths. > > > > vmwgfx seems to be doing some strange things in its page_flip > > handlers. Since I'm not an expert of this codebase just wrap some > > FIXME comments around the potentially problematic code. > > > > We've got proper patches for these. Apparently they got lost in my -next > pull request, though.
Yeah I wondered why this one here didn't conflict yet, I can carry it around a bit longer as a memo. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel