On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:45:34 +0200, Paul Menzel <paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 19.09.2012, 11:34 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 04:04:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:55:59 -0700, Jesse Barnes > > > <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote: > > > > Yeah, looks good. Did we used to not touch the crtc in the plane > > > > cleanup? Either way this is safer. > > > > > > I think the bug only came to light because QA is now routinely running > > > with slub_debug. > > > > And QA now confirmed that this patch fixes things: > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54101 > > Tested-by: lu hua <huax...@intel.com> > > Lu Hua*x*?
The 'x' is just part of Intel's policy for indicating a contractor in email addresses, which can be quite confusing. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
