On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:10:39 +0900, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 09/20/2012 02:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com> > > wrote: > >> On 09/17/2012 06:38 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> As during the plane cleanup, we wish to disable the hardware and > >>> so may modify state on the associated CRTC, that CRTC must continue to > >>> exist until we are finished. > >> > >> A similar issue can occur in the drm_framebuffer_cleanup(). If crtc and > >> plane use same framebuffer and the framebuffer is destroyed, crtc is > >> turned off prior to turning off plane. > >> > > I imagine my patch to add refcnt'ing to fb would help in this case.. > > > > BR, > > -R > > Even if the patch to add refcnt'ing to fb is applied, same issue will > occur in the drm_framebuffer_remove(). It can delay to destroy the fb, > but cannot change crtc and plane disable order. > > >>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54101 > >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > >>> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > >>> --- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 ++++---- > >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > >>> index 6fbfc24..af81f77 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > >>> @@ -1034,15 +1034,15 @@ void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device > >>> *dev) > >>> fb->funcs->destroy(fb); > >>> } > >>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, > >>> head) { > >>> - crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc); > >>> - } > >>> - > >>> list_for_each_entry_safe(plane, plt, > >>> &dev->mode_config.plane_list, > >>> head) { > >>> plane->funcs->destroy(plane); > >>> } > >>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, > >>> head) { > >>> + crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc); > >>> + } > >>> + > >>> idr_remove_all(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr); > >>> idr_destroy(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr); > >>> } > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dri-devel mailing list > >> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > From: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Destroy the planes prior to destroying the associated CRTC To: Rob Clark <rob.cl...@linaro.org>, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com> Cc: airl...@redhat.com, sta...@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: <caf6aegvoza_zhrjn212rsn-gmmuywolt6ufy9iindi8awx9...@mail.gmail.com> References: <1347874683-21191-1-git-send-email-ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> <505a850a.4010...@samsung.com> <caf6aegvoza_zhrjn212rsn-gmmuywolt6ufy9iindi8awx9...@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:38:04 -0500, Rob Clark <rob.cl...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com> > wrote: > > On 09/17/2012 06:38 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > >> As during the plane cleanup, we wish to disable the hardware and > >> so may modify state on the associated CRTC, that CRTC must continue to > >> exist until we are finished. > > > > > > A similar issue can occur in the drm_framebuffer_cleanup(). If crtc and > > plane use same framebuffer and the framebuffer is destroyed, crtc is > > turned off prior to turning off plane. > > > > I imagine my patch to add refcnt'ing to fb would help in this case.. > > BR, > -R > > >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54101 > >> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > >> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > >> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 ++++---- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > >> index 6fbfc24..af81f77 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > >> @@ -1034,15 +1034,15 @@ void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device > >> *dev) > >> fb->funcs->destroy(fb); > >> } > >> - list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, > >> head) { > >> - crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc); > >> - } > >> - > >> list_for_each_entry_safe(plane, plt, &dev->mode_config.plane_list, > >> head) { > >> plane->funcs->destroy(plane); > >> } > >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, > >> head) { > >> + crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc); > >> + } > >> + > >> idr_remove_all(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr); > >> idr_destroy(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr); > >> } > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dri-devel mailing list > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel From: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Destroy the planes prior to destroying the associated CRTC To: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, airl...@redhat.com, sta...@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <505a850a.4010...@samsung.com> References: <1347874683-21191-1-git-send-email-ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> <505a850a.4010...@samsung.com> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:52:58 +0900, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 09/17/2012 06:38 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As during the plane cleanup, we wish to disable the hardware and > > so may modify state on the associated CRTC, that CRTC must continue to > > exist until we are finished. > > A similar issue can occur in the drm_framebuffer_cleanup(). If crtc and > plane use same framebuffer and the framebuffer is destroyed, crtc is > turned off prior to turning off plane. This is not an issue in our code as disabling the CRTCs should automatically disable any associated planes, and so the second pass over the planes should be a no-op. The issue during destroy drm_mode_config_cleanup() is that we actually free the CRTC objects and then try to decouple the planes which causes us to reference the just-freed objects in order to see if the hw needs updating. However, reordering the sequence to be CRTCs last would help for consistency. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
