On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:53:15PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This code is *so* much nicer than before.  I hope you feel good about
> the changes.  It makes me happy to look at this code now.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:34:19AM +0000, Xin Ji wrote:
> > +static int edid_read(struct anx7625_data *ctx,
> > +                u8 offset, u8 *pblock_buf)
> > +{
> > +   int ret, cnt;
> > +   struct device *dev = &ctx->client->dev;
> > +
> > +   for (cnt = 0; cnt < EDID_TRY_CNT; cnt++) {
                                          ^^^^^

> > +           sp_tx_aux_wr(ctx, offset);
> > +           /* set I2C read com 0x01 mot = 0 and read 16 bytes */
> > +           ret = sp_tx_aux_rd(ctx, 0xf1);
> > +
> > +           if (ret) {
> > +                   sp_tx_rst_aux(ctx);
> > +                   DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "edid read failed, reset!\n");
> > +                   cnt++;
                        ^^^^^

I mean that it's incremented twice, yeah?

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to