On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:33:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:41:17PM -0800, Jianxin Xiong wrote: > > The fact that the size of dma-buf is invariant over the lifetime of the > > buffer is mentioned in the comment of 'dma_buf_ops.mmap', but is not > > documented at where the info is defined. Add the missing documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xi...@intel.com> > > Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch. For the preceeding > dma-buf patch I'll wait for more review/acks before I apply it. Ack from > Jason might also be good, since looks like this dma_virt_ops is only used > in rdma.
We are likely to delete it entirely this cycle, Christoph already has a patch series to do it: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?series=379277 So, lets just forget about it Jason _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
