On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:25:14AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:33:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:41:17PM -0800, Jianxin Xiong wrote: > > > The fact that the size of dma-buf is invariant over the lifetime of the > > > buffer is mentioned in the comment of 'dma_buf_ops.mmap', but is not > > > documented at where the info is defined. Add the missing documentation. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xi...@intel.com> > > > > Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch. For the preceeding > > dma-buf patch I'll wait for more review/acks before I apply it. Ack from > > Jason might also be good, since looks like this dma_virt_ops is only used > > in rdma. > > We are likely to delete it entirely this cycle, Christoph already has > a patch series to do it: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?series=379277 > > So, lets just forget about it
I can get behind that :-) Also I realized that even when we need it, probably best if you merge it to avoid a partially broken feature in the rdma tree. So not my problem anyway ... Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
