On Tue, 10 May 2022 08:38:38 +0900 Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com> wrote:
> Yes, I was talking about A and L'. > > > detect that regardless of L. A nested lock associates the the nesting with > > When I checked Lockdep code, L' with depth n + 1 and L' with depth n > have different classes in Lockdep. If that's the case, then that's a bug in lockdep. > > That's why I said Lockdep cannot detect it. By any chance, has it > changed so as to consider this case? Or am I missing something? No, it's not that lockdep cannot detect it, it should detect it. If it is not detecting it, then we need to fix that. -- Steve
