On 7/13/23 11:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Am 13.07.23 um 10:53 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> On 7/13/23 10:49, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> Am 13.07.23 um 10:32 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >>>> On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: >>>>> On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote: >>>>>> On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC connector >>>>>>> even when the hardware doesn't have it ? >>>>>> >>>>>> If not properly setting up, I think you will create two encoder and two >>>>>> connector in the system. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, but I think it won't have any visible effect for the end-user. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid user-space display servers would waste effort producing content >>>> for a non-existing BMC (assuming its connector status is connected or >>>> unknown). >>> >>> Right now, the BMC output works because the VGA status is always connected. >>> So nothing really changes. >> >> User-space display servers would generally produce different contents by >> default for the VGA & BMC connectors. > > Can you elaborate? How would the output differ?
Per the other sub-thread, I didn't realize there's only a single CRTC. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and Xwayland developer
